|
|
|
Marcus Rutherford D J Freeman 43 Fetter Lane London EC4 A1JU. 5 October 2000 Your ref
MWR/PAS/011311999 Dear
Mr Rutherford, Following
your acknowledgement of the 20 September 2000, your client Shell has now
specifically refused, on at least four separate occasions, to re-state that
Shell did not have a nuclear reactor/testing cell at its Thornton Research
Centre in the 1960’s, as per Shell’s Narrative of 7 February 1994*.
Furthermore, your client Shell has now declined to (re)state** that they
did NOT carry out the secret, primarily military, nuclear research programmes as
set out in paragraphs 51-78 of my draft Statement of Claim, and elsewhere. *‘(a) Shell Thornton was not involved in "atomic research"
(page 1).’ ‘(b) Thornton did not house a "nuclear facility"…. Thornton
did not and never has housed a pile or reactor. (page
2).’ **‘(c) We do not understand what you mean by
"atomic research for military purposes". We have already explained that Thornton was not involved in
any atomic research (page 2).’ As per my informing Shell, its legal head and
yourself, that I reserve the right to publish my findings via the WEB.
Consequently, I confirm that I have a WEB site.
My WEB site is presently ‘empty’.
However, I enclose a CD containing its proposed contents.
Please 1.
Place CD
in CD tray (usually drive D). 2.
Double
click ‘My computer’ icon 3.
Click CD
ROM drive (select D, E or F, to open-up ‘WEB site’). 4.
By
clipping on any of the blue highlights, or page bottoms you automatically open
up the said hyperlink (page). 5.
Should
you encounter any difficulties please do not hesitate to directly contact me. You will see that my WEB site will contain the most
shocking allegations ever made against any multinational, or other, corporation.
Of course, if Shell believes any of the allegations are untrue it will to
quote your letter of the 11 August 2000: ‘….
take whatever action it sees fit in order to protect its reputation from false
attacks.’ ‘They (Shell)
would however, have no hesitation in protecting their reputation from
defamatory attacks.’ I await your ‘writs’, if Shell maintains that it did not hire known
criminals to decommission its nuclear reactor/testing cell in 1968 and order as
per Shell’s prior plan, the illegal mass dumping of its nuclear
materials/waste, if Shell did not carry out the extensive military, and
other, nuclear programmes, as set-out in paragraphs 51-71 of my Statement of
Claim, if Shell disputes that it did construct a knowingly fraudulent Narrative
in 1994, in order to cover-up its nuclear dumping crimes. Your clients, Shell have seven days to
either commence legal proceedings, or forward their proposals.
Should Shell fail to do either, then I shall
‘publish’ via my WEB site, the enclosed CD contents, with immediate
effect. Furthermore, as previously stated, I will
distribute leaflets
setting out Shell’s wholesale nuclear dumping crimes at Thornton Research
Centre, Cheshire and Shell Headquarters, London Yours sincerely, John Dyer. cc Mark Moody-Stuart cc Jeroen van der Veer cc Richard Max Wiseman
|